Summary: | The research on gender training 1 based on the subjectivity-intersubjectivity that underlies the act of gendered subjectivity, the perception and awareness that the training subjects generate in their actions, responds to a motivation in which they combine , paradoxically, two fundamental elements: the personal and the social. When interacting, these elements generate social gender relations that, despite their complex tension, can play an essential formative role in the construction of conscious subjects of their acts.Uncovering what these relationships entail from specific gender situations requires a critical reflection that allows the identification of substantial findings for the construction of emancipatory and transforming training processes. However, the clarification of the meanings and scope of these relationships implies a methodological difficulty, because the construction of rules is made on the basis of an open constitutive, in which people participate in a permanent game of interactions in the who carry and follow one or several guidelines. This research, precisely, gives an account of what can be done by those who, when interacting, present argued propositions about the problematic and revealing phenomenon of gender.In the unveiling of subjectivity, experience plays a fundamental role because it represents the enthusiasm towards the phenomenon in which the subject is immersed, but it offers a difficulty in pretending, on the one hand, to be aware of what is happening, and on the other, think about the possibilities of change. This complex exercise confronts and recreates the similarity between the structure of experience and the possibility contemplated as part of its construction, in which it is not possible to reach a full level of satisfaction. In any case, the phenomenon stands as a possibility of understanding, since its alternation affects the world view in relation to other everyday visions.
|