The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes
Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683 |
| _version_ | 1801706587403845632 |
|---|---|
| author | Vega Pérez, Leonel Antonio Ariza Mantilla, Dianey Carolina |
| author_facet | Vega Pérez, Leonel Antonio Ariza Mantilla, Dianey Carolina |
| author_sort | Vega Pérez, Leonel Antonio |
| collection | OJS |
| description | Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation of the parties to provide evidence, which differs from the dynamic burden of prooftheory. For this reason, an analysis of the preponderant theories in this matter was carried out in order to later develop in a timely manner the theory of duty-obligation of the parties to provide evidence, contemplated in Sentence C 218282017 of the Supreme Court of Justice, taking into account their main characteristics, their legal effects, and their differences with the dynamicburden of proof. In this study, it was evidenced that this new evidentiary theory moves away from the dynamic burden of proof, and demarcates a new position of the Supreme Court of Justice in medical liability processes. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-13683 |
| institution | Revista Derecho y Realidad |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-136832021-11-21T02:39:09Z The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes La teoría del deber - obligación de las partes, en los procesos de responsabilidad médica A teoria do dever - obrigação das partes, nos processos de responsabilidade médica Vega Pérez, Leonel Antonio Ariza Mantilla, Dianey Carolina dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load. carga procesal obligación deber carga dinámica Prueba Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual. Medical liability processes, by their nature, have a high degree of difficulty in evidentiary matters, which is why the different courts have adopted theories to try to solve said problem; to this extent, the positions adopted have varied significantly. One of the most recent is the duty- obligation of the parties to provide evidence, which differs from the dynamic burden of prooftheory. For this reason, an analysis of the preponderant theories in this matter was carried out in order to later develop in a timely manner the theory of duty-obligation of the parties to provide evidence, contemplated in Sentence C 218282017 of the Supreme Court of Justice, taking into account their main characteristics, their legal effects, and their differences with the dynamicburden of proof. In this study, it was evidenced that this new evidentiary theory moves away from the dynamic burden of proof, and demarcates a new position of the Supreme Court of Justice in medical liability processes. Los procesos de responsabilidad médica, por su naturaleza, revisten alto grado de dificultad en materia probatoria, es por esto que las diferentes cortes han adoptado teorías para tratar de resolver dicha problemática; en esta medida las posturas adoptadas han variado de manera significativa. Una de las más recientes es la de deber- obligación de las partes de aportar pruebas,que difiere de la teoría de la carga dinámica de la prueba. Por esto, se realizó un análisis de las teorías preponderantes en esta materia para luego desarrollar de manera puntual la teoría de deber- obligación de las partes de aportar pruebas, contemplada en la Sentencia C 218282017 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, teniendo en cuenta sus características principales, sus efectos jurídicos, y sus diferencias con la carga dinámica de la prueba. En este estudio, se evidenció que esta nueva teoría probatoria se aleja de la carga dinámica de la prueba, y demarca una nueva posición de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en los procesos de responsabilidad médica. Os processos de responsabilidade médica, por sua natureza, apresentam alto grau de dificuldade em matéria probatória, é por isso que os diferentes tribunais têm adotado teorias para tentar resolver o referido problema; nesta medida as posições adotadas têm variado de certa forma significativo. Uma das mais recentes é o dever-obrigação das partes de apresentarem provas,que difere da teoria da prova de carga dinâmica. Portanto, uma análise do teorias preponderantes neste assunto para posteriormente desenvolver em tempo hábil a teoria da dever- obrigação das partes de apresentarem provas, prevista na Sentença C 218282017 de o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, levando em consideração suas principais características, seus efeitoslegais e suas diferenças com o ônus da prova dinâmico. Neste estudo, foi mostrado que Esta nova teoria das evidências afasta-se do ônus da prova dinâmico e demarca um novo posição do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça em processos de responsabilidade médica. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2019-07-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683 Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 No. 34 (2019); 117-132 Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 17 Núm. 34 (2019); 117-132 Derecho y Realidad; v. 17 n. 34 (2019); 117-132 2619-5607 1692-3936 10.19053/16923936.v17.n34.2019 spa https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683/11144 Derechos de autor 2019 Derecho y realidad http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load. carga procesal obligación deber carga dinámica Prueba Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual. Vega Pérez, Leonel Antonio Ariza Mantilla, Dianey Carolina The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title | The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title_alt | La teoría del deber - obligación de las partes, en los procesos de responsabilidad médica A teoria do dever - obrigação das partes, nos processos de responsabilidade médica |
| title_full | The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title_fullStr | The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title_full_unstemmed | The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title_short | The theory of duty - obligation of the parties, in medical liability processes |
| title_sort | theory of duty obligation of the parties in medical liability processes |
| topic | dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load. carga procesal obligación deber carga dinámica Prueba Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual. |
| topic_facet | dynamic load; must; obligation; procedural load. carga procesal obligación deber carga dinámica Prueba Teste; carga dinâmica; deve; obrigação; ónus processual. |
| url | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/13683 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vegaperezleonelantonio thetheoryofdutyobligationofthepartiesinmedicalliabilityprocesses AT arizamantilladianeycarolina thetheoryofdutyobligationofthepartiesinmedicalliabilityprocesses AT vegaperezleonelantonio lateoriadeldeberobligaciondelaspartesenlosprocesosderesponsabilidadmedica AT arizamantilladianeycarolina lateoriadeldeberobligaciondelaspartesenlosprocesosderesponsabilidadmedica AT vegaperezleonelantonio ateoriadodeverobrigacaodaspartesnosprocessosderesponsabilidademedica AT arizamantilladianeycarolina ateoriadodeverobrigacaodaspartesnosprocessosderesponsabilidademedica AT vegaperezleonelantonio theoryofdutyobligationofthepartiesinmedicalliabilityprocesses AT arizamantilladianeycarolina theoryofdutyobligationofthepartiesinmedicalliabilityprocesses |
