Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation
The rise of digital repositories has framed a significant advance in access to academic and scientific knowledge, increasing its impact due to greater reach and lower cost. However, these platforms are a new topic that initially did not have standards or models to carry out their implementation and...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/14724 |
| _version_ | 1801706099655573504 |
|---|---|
| author | González-Sanabria, Juan-Sebastián Ramos-Corredor, Fabián-Nicolás Amezquita-Becerra, Germán |
| author_facet | González-Sanabria, Juan-Sebastián Ramos-Corredor, Fabián-Nicolás Amezquita-Becerra, Germán |
| author_sort | González-Sanabria, Juan-Sebastián |
| collection | OJS |
| description | The rise of digital repositories has framed a significant advance in access to academic and scientific knowledge, increasing its impact due to greater reach and lower cost. However, these platforms are a new topic that initially did not have standards or models to carry out their implementation and operation, which is why there were inconsistencies between repositories on issues such as interoperability, digital preservation, among others. Due to the lack of standardization and the exponential increase in the number of repositories, different organizations and researchers made multiple proposals to standardize the processes and characteristics of these platforms. The proposals materialized in models, such as the Dublin Core and DataCite metadata schemes, and in guides for the evaluation and implementation of repositories, such as the "Guide for the evaluation of institutional research repositories" by RECOLECTA or the DINI certificate (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerk Information). The latter aim to evaluate the platforms in their entirety, including 8 sections with a total of 87 elements. Therefore, in this research an application was developed to automate the evaluation of repositories, automating processes that improve educational work using computer tools and their integration. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-14724 |
| institution | Revista Facultad de Ingeniería |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-147242022-11-18T19:23:32Z Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation Herramienta para la automatización de la evaluación de repositorios institucionales González-Sanabria, Juan-Sebastián Ramos-Corredor, Fabián-Nicolás Amezquita-Becerra, Germán evaluation institutional repositories process automation software development automatización de proceso desarrollo de software evaluación repositorios institucionales The rise of digital repositories has framed a significant advance in access to academic and scientific knowledge, increasing its impact due to greater reach and lower cost. However, these platforms are a new topic that initially did not have standards or models to carry out their implementation and operation, which is why there were inconsistencies between repositories on issues such as interoperability, digital preservation, among others. Due to the lack of standardization and the exponential increase in the number of repositories, different organizations and researchers made multiple proposals to standardize the processes and characteristics of these platforms. The proposals materialized in models, such as the Dublin Core and DataCite metadata schemes, and in guides for the evaluation and implementation of repositories, such as the "Guide for the evaluation of institutional research repositories" by RECOLECTA or the DINI certificate (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerk Information). The latter aim to evaluate the platforms in their entirety, including 8 sections with a total of 87 elements. Therefore, in this research an application was developed to automate the evaluation of repositories, automating processes that improve educational work using computer tools and their integration. El auge de los repositorios digitales ha enmarcado un avance significativo en el acceso al conocimiento académico y científico, aumentando su impacto debido a un mayor alcance y un menor costo. Sin embargo, estas plataformas son un tema novedoso que en un principio no contó con estándares o modelos para llevar a cabo su implementación y funcionamiento, por lo cual se presentaron inconsistencias entre repositorios en temas como interoperabilidad, preservación digital, entre otros. A causa de la falta de normalización y el incremento exponencial de la cantidad de repositorios, diferentes organizaciones e investigadores realizaron múltiples propuestas para estandarizar los procesos y características de dichas plataformas. Las propuestas se materializaron en modelos, como los esquemas de metadatos Dublin Core y DataCite, y en guías para la evaluación e implementación de repositorios, como la “Guía para la evaluación de repositorios institucionales de investigación” de RECOLECTA o el certificado DINI (Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerk Information). Estas últimas pretenden evaluar las plataformas en su totalidad incluyendo 8 apartados con un total de 87 elementos. Por lo anterior, en esta investigación se desarrolló un aplicativo para la automatización de la evaluación de repositorios, automatizando procesos que mejorar el quehacer educativo mediante el uso de herramientas informáticas y la integración de estas. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2022-08-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/xml https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/14724 10.19053/01211129.v31.n61.2022.14724 Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 No. 61 (2022): July-September 2022 (Continuous Publication); e14724 Revista Facultad de Ingeniería; Vol. 31 Núm. 61 (2022): Julio-Septiembre 2022 (Publicación Continua); e14724 2357-5328 0121-1129 eng https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/14724/11995 https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/14724/12311 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | evaluation institutional repositories process automation software development automatización de proceso desarrollo de software evaluación repositorios institucionales González-Sanabria, Juan-Sebastián Ramos-Corredor, Fabián-Nicolás Amezquita-Becerra, Germán Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title | Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title_alt | Herramienta para la automatización de la evaluación de repositorios institucionales |
| title_full | Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title_short | Automation Tool for Institutional Repositories Evaluation |
| title_sort | automation tool for institutional repositories evaluation |
| topic | evaluation institutional repositories process automation software development automatización de proceso desarrollo de software evaluación repositorios institucionales |
| topic_facet | evaluation institutional repositories process automation software development automatización de proceso desarrollo de software evaluación repositorios institucionales |
| url | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/14724 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalezsanabriajuansebastian automationtoolforinstitutionalrepositoriesevaluation AT ramoscorredorfabiannicolas automationtoolforinstitutionalrepositoriesevaluation AT amezquitabecerragerman automationtoolforinstitutionalrepositoriesevaluation AT gonzalezsanabriajuansebastian herramientaparalaautomatizaciondelaevaluacionderepositoriosinstitucionales AT ramoscorredorfabiannicolas herramientaparalaautomatizaciondelaevaluacionderepositoriosinstitucionales AT amezquitabecerragerman herramientaparalaautomatizaciondelaevaluacionderepositoriosinstitucionales |
