Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink
This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivi...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857 |
| _version_ | 1801706359417208832 |
|---|---|
| author | Gómez Chitiva, Juan Sebastián Escalante Sarrias, Andrés Felipe Montoya Giraldo, Oscar Danilo |
| author_facet | Gómez Chitiva, Juan Sebastián Escalante Sarrias, Andrés Felipe Montoya Giraldo, Oscar Danilo |
| author_sort | Gómez Chitiva, Juan Sebastián |
| collection | OJS |
| description | This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivity-based control (PI-PBC) and (ii) inverse optimal control with PI action (IOC-PI). The main advantage of the PI-PBC and IOC-PI controllers is that both ensure the stable operation of the converter via Lyapunov's stability theory. In addition, in both controllers, integral action enables the elimination of non-modeled dynamics in the converter by allowing it to reach the reference with minimal stabilization times. The results showed that, despite the fact that all utilized simulation software applications had their advantages, the one with the best dynamic response for both nonlinear controls was PSIM. Moreover, it is easier to use for someone who has never worked with a simulation environment. The main objective of this research was to compare simulation software and find the most suitable environment for evaluating and implementing nonlinear control with regard to power electronic converter applications. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-15857 |
| institution | Revista Ciencia en Desarrollo |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-158572024-05-11T07:17:03Z Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink Evaluación de controladores para un convertidor elevador mediante las teorías PI-PBC & IOC-PI para soporte de tensión en cargas lineales: validaciones numéricas en PSIM, PLECS y MATLAB/Simulink Gómez Chitiva, Juan Sebastián Escalante Sarrias, Andrés Felipe Montoya Giraldo, Oscar Danilo This paper presents a comparison of the voltage and current dynamic responses for the Boost converter in three different simulation software, namely PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink, while using two types of nonlinear controllers. The utilized controller designs are (i) proportional-integral passivity-based control (PI-PBC) and (ii) inverse optimal control with PI action (IOC-PI). The main advantage of the PI-PBC and IOC-PI controllers is that both ensure the stable operation of the converter via Lyapunov's stability theory. In addition, in both controllers, integral action enables the elimination of non-modeled dynamics in the converter by allowing it to reach the reference with minimal stabilization times. The results showed that, despite the fact that all utilized simulation software applications had their advantages, the one with the best dynamic response for both nonlinear controls was PSIM. Moreover, it is easier to use for someone who has never worked with a simulation environment. The main objective of this research was to compare simulation software and find the most suitable environment for evaluating and implementing nonlinear control with regard to power electronic converter applications. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2024-04-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857 10.19053/01217488.v15.n1.2024.15857 Ciencia En Desarrollo; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-Junio Ciencia en Desarrollo; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024): Vol 15, Núm.1 (2024): Enero-Junio 2462-7658 0121-7488 |
| spellingShingle | Gómez Chitiva, Juan Sebastián Escalante Sarrias, Andrés Felipe Montoya Giraldo, Oscar Danilo Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title | Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_alt | Evaluación de controladores para un convertidor elevador mediante las teorías PI-PBC & IOC-PI para soporte de tensión en cargas lineales: validaciones numéricas en PSIM, PLECS y MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_full | Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_fullStr | Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_full_unstemmed | Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_short | Control Evaluation for a Boost Converter via the PI-PBC \& IOC-PI Theories for Voltage Support in Linear Loads: Numerical validations in PSIM, PLECS, and MATLAB/Simulink |
| title_sort | control evaluation for a boost converter via the pi pbc ioc pi theories for voltage support in linear loads numerical validations in psim plecs and matlab simulink |
| url | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/15857 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezchitivajuansebastian controlevaluationforaboostconverterviathepipbciocpitheoriesforvoltagesupportinlinearloadsnumericalvalidationsinpsimplecsandmatlabsimulink AT escalantesarriasandresfelipe controlevaluationforaboostconverterviathepipbciocpitheoriesforvoltagesupportinlinearloadsnumericalvalidationsinpsimplecsandmatlabsimulink AT montoyagiraldooscardanilo controlevaluationforaboostconverterviathepipbciocpitheoriesforvoltagesupportinlinearloadsnumericalvalidationsinpsimplecsandmatlabsimulink AT gomezchitivajuansebastian evaluaciondecontroladoresparaunconvertidorelevadormediantelasteoriaspipbciocpiparasoportedetensionencargaslinealesvalidacionesnumericasenpsimplecsymatlabsimulink AT escalantesarriasandresfelipe evaluaciondecontroladoresparaunconvertidorelevadormediantelasteoriaspipbciocpiparasoportedetensionencargaslinealesvalidacionesnumericasenpsimplecsymatlabsimulink AT montoyagiraldooscardanilo evaluaciondecontroladoresparaunconvertidorelevadormediantelasteoriaspipbciocpiparasoportedetensionencargaslinealesvalidacionesnumericasenpsimplecsymatlabsimulink |
