Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?

In this article, there is a discussion in the outcomes between to receive education development through specific or transversely subjects. The persistence of gender stereotypes and the sexual division of in the job is related to the lack of social awareness, due, among other factors to the lack of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asián Chaves, Rosario, Cabeza Verdugo, Francisca, Sosa Vicente, Rodríguez
Format: Online
Language:spa
Published: Sociedad de Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana y la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/3310
_version_ 1801706193896341504
author Asián Chaves, Rosario
Cabeza Verdugo, Francisca
Sosa Vicente, Rodríguez
author_facet Asián Chaves, Rosario
Cabeza Verdugo, Francisca
Sosa Vicente, Rodríguez
author_sort Asián Chaves, Rosario
collection OJS
description In this article, there is a discussion in the outcomes between to receive education development through specific or transversely subjects. The persistence of gender stereotypes and the sexual division of in the job is related to the lack of social awareness, due, among other factors to the lack of education in gender issues. This instruction is necessary to reflect and ´deconstruct´ messages about gender to reveal the ideological premises and hierarchies and the hierarchies in the underlying messages. The main objective is to note the importance of receiving training in gender at the University. It proposes to compare the results of the surveys aimed to the students in the bachelor of Science of Work and in Business Administration and Management, and see if there are differences between the two groups, both in relation to their training on the subject, such as with their behavior and attitudes compared to certain genderrelated issues. In addition, one could try to see, if there is a difference, to what extent can be derived from the education received. Past surveys have been to a representative sample of students of both degrees and have been applied the appropriate statistical techniques through the software SPSS. Work results reinforce the initial idea of the need to include subjects that provide gender educational programs and university degrees and raise not only disciplinary knowledge focused ‘knowing’ and guided professionals ‘know-how’, but also attitudes for an ethical commitment aimed at gender equity.
format Online
id oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-3310
institution Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana
language spa
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedad de Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana y la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
record_format ojs
spelling oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-33102023-09-06T20:36:12Z Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education? Formación en Género en la Universidad: ¿Materia de asignaturas específicas o de educación transversal? Asián Chaves, Rosario Cabeza Verdugo, Francisca Sosa Vicente, Rodríguez History of Latin American Education Journal Education-instruction development gender sexual sterotype woman participation. Social Sciences Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana formación género estereotipo sexual participación de la mujer. Ciencias Sociales In this article, there is a discussion in the outcomes between to receive education development through specific or transversely subjects. The persistence of gender stereotypes and the sexual division of in the job is related to the lack of social awareness, due, among other factors to the lack of education in gender issues. This instruction is necessary to reflect and ´deconstruct´ messages about gender to reveal the ideological premises and hierarchies and the hierarchies in the underlying messages. The main objective is to note the importance of receiving training in gender at the University. It proposes to compare the results of the surveys aimed to the students in the bachelor of Science of Work and in Business Administration and Management, and see if there are differences between the two groups, both in relation to their training on the subject, such as with their behavior and attitudes compared to certain genderrelated issues. In addition, one could try to see, if there is a difference, to what extent can be derived from the education received. Past surveys have been to a representative sample of students of both degrees and have been applied the appropriate statistical techniques through the software SPSS. Work results reinforce the initial idea of the need to include subjects that provide gender educational programs and university degrees and raise not only disciplinary knowledge focused ‘knowing’ and guided professionals ‘know-how’, but also attitudes for an ethical commitment aimed at gender equity. En este artículo se debaten los diferentes resultados de recibir una formación mediante asignaturas específicas o de forma transversal. La persistencia de estereotipos de género y la división sexual del trabajo está relacionada con la falta de concienciación social, debida, entre otros factores, a la falta de formación en cuestiones de género. Esta formación es necesaria para reflexionar y ‘deconstruir’ los mensajes sobre género para desvelar las premisas ideológicas y las jerarquías subyacentes en los mensajes.El objetivo principal es constatar la importancia de recibir formación en género en la Universidad. Para ello se propone comparar los resultados de las encuestas dirigidas al alumnado de las licenciaturas en Ciencias del Trabajo y en Administración y Dirección de Empresas y observar si existen diferencias entre ambos grupos, tanto en relación con su formación sobre la materia, como con su comportamiento y actitud frente a determinadas cuestiones relacionadas con el género. Además, se trataría de ver, si existe diferencia, en qué medida puede derivarse de la formación recibida.Se han pasado encuestas a una muestra representativa de alumnas/os de ambas titulaciones y se han aplicado las oportunas técnicas estadísticas a través del software SPSS.Los resultados del trabajo refuerzan la idea inicial de la necesidad de incorporar asignaturas que den formación en género en programas y titulaciones universitarias y plantear no sólo conocimientos disciplinares orientados al ‘saber’ y profesionales orientados al ‘saber hacer’, sino también actitudes para un compromiso ético orientadas a la equidad de género. Sociedad de Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana y la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2015-01-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/3310 10.19053/01227238.3310 Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana; Vol. 17 No. 24 (2015): Ofelia Uribe de Acosta; 35-54 Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana; Vol. 17 Núm. 24 (2015): Ofelia Uribe de Acosta; 35-54 2256-5248 0122-7238 spa https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/3310/2982 https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/3310/5811 Copyright (c) 2015 Journal History of Latin American Education
spellingShingle History of Latin American Education Journal
Education-instruction
development
gender
sexual sterotype
woman participation.
Social Sciences
Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana
formación
género
estereotipo sexual
participación de la mujer.
Ciencias Sociales
Asián Chaves, Rosario
Cabeza Verdugo, Francisca
Sosa Vicente, Rodríguez
Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title_alt Formación en Género en la Universidad: ¿Materia de asignaturas específicas o de educación transversal?
title_full Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title_fullStr Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title_full_unstemmed Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title_short Education development in Gender at the University: Field of specific subjects or cross education?
title_sort education development in gender at the university field of specific subjects or cross education
topic History of Latin American Education Journal
Education-instruction
development
gender
sexual sterotype
woman participation.
Social Sciences
Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana
formación
género
estereotipo sexual
participación de la mujer.
Ciencias Sociales
topic_facet History of Latin American Education Journal
Education-instruction
development
gender
sexual sterotype
woman participation.
Social Sciences
Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana
formación
género
estereotipo sexual
participación de la mujer.
Ciencias Sociales
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/3310
work_keys_str_mv AT asianchavesrosario educationdevelopmentingenderattheuniversityfieldofspecificsubjectsorcrosseducation
AT cabezaverdugofrancisca educationdevelopmentingenderattheuniversityfieldofspecificsubjectsorcrosseducation
AT sosavicenterodriguez educationdevelopmentingenderattheuniversityfieldofspecificsubjectsorcrosseducation
AT asianchavesrosario formacionengeneroenlauniversidadmateriadeasignaturasespecificasodeeducaciontransversal
AT cabezaverdugofrancisca formacionengeneroenlauniversidadmateriadeasignaturasespecificasodeeducaciontransversal
AT sosavicenterodriguez formacionengeneroenlauniversidadmateriadeasignaturasespecificasodeeducaciontransversal