Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation
In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570 |
| _version_ | 1801706534614335488 |
|---|---|
| author | Guagua-Castillo, Jairo Torres-Quijano, César Alberto |
| author_facet | Guagua-Castillo, Jairo Torres-Quijano, César Alberto |
| author_sort | Guagua-Castillo, Jairo |
| collection | OJS |
| description | In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by rules, but also for principles which today are considered as binding rules. In this regard, to avoid arbitrariness of judge decisions, there are a number of theories that seek to provide a valid and plausible basis for the assessments that determine the legal decision. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-4570 |
| institution | Revista Derecho y Realidad |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-45702021-07-12T07:34:46Z Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation El consecuencialismo como límite en la argumentación constitucional y legal y jurídica Guagua-Castillo, Jairo Torres-Quijano, César Alberto Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo In search of an explanation of the tools that must use the legal operator for making a decision, there have been different methods of interpretation and argumentation, but as the law is constantly evolving, these methods have been insufficient, in the understanding that the law consists not only by rules, but also for principles which today are considered as binding rules. In this regard, to avoid arbitrariness of judge decisions, there are a number of theories that seek to provide a valid and plausible basis for the assessments that determine the legal decision. En búsqueda de la explicación de las herramientas de las que se debe valer el operador jurídico para la toma de una decisión, han surgido diferentes métodos de interpretación y argumentación, pero como el derecho tiene una evolución constante, estos métodos han sido insuficientes, en el entendido de que el derecho no solo está conformado por reglas, sino por los principios que hoy se consideran como normas vinculantes. En este sentido, para procurar que los fallos de los jueces no sean arbitrarios, ha surgido una serie de teorías que pretenden proporcionar un fundamento valido y plausible para las valoraciones que determinan la decisión jurídica. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2014-06-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570 10.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014.4570 Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 Derecho y Realidad; Vol. 12 Núm. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 Derecho y Realidad; v. 12 n. 23 (2014): Enero - Junio; 230-235 2619-5607 1692-3936 10.19053/16923936.v1.n23.2014 spa https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570/4265 Derechos de autor 2014 Derecho y Realidad |
| spellingShingle | Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo Guagua-Castillo, Jairo Torres-Quijano, César Alberto Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title | Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_alt | El consecuencialismo como límite en la argumentación constitucional y legal y jurídica |
| title_full | Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_fullStr | Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_short | Consequentialism as a limit on constitutional, legal and juridical argumentation |
| title_sort | consequentialism as a limit on constitutional legal and juridical argumentation |
| topic | Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo |
| topic_facet | Juridical argument, juridical decision, justice, arbitrariness, rules, principles, consequentialism Argumentación jurídica, decisión jurídica, justicia, arbitrariedad, reglas, principios, consecuencialismo |
| url | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/derecho_realidad/article/view/4570 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guaguacastillojairo consequentialismasalimitonconstitutionallegalandjuridicalargumentation AT torresquijanocesaralberto consequentialismasalimitonconstitutionallegalandjuridicalargumentation AT guaguacastillojairo elconsecuencialismocomolimiteenlaargumentacionconstitucionalylegalyjuridica AT torresquijanocesaralberto elconsecuencialismocomolimiteenlaargumentacionconstitucionalylegalyjuridica |
