Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs.
This work aimed to study the influence of two additives (microbial preparation and antibiotic growth promoter) on the productive and sanitary response of pigs in growth-feed. 120 castrated pigs of 71 days and 28.62 kg were used; they were distributed in three groups according to a completely randomi...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/6089 |
| _version_ | 1801706471133544448 |
|---|---|
| author | Flores-Mancheno, Luis Gerardo García-Hernández, Yaneisy Caicedo-Quinche, William Orlando Usca-Méndez, Julio Enrique |
| author_facet | Flores-Mancheno, Luis Gerardo García-Hernández, Yaneisy Caicedo-Quinche, William Orlando Usca-Méndez, Julio Enrique |
| author_sort | Flores-Mancheno, Luis Gerardo |
| collection | OJS |
| description | This work aimed to study the influence of two additives (microbial preparation and antibiotic growth promoter) on the productive and sanitary response of pigs in growth-feed. 120 castrated pigs of 71 days and 28.62 kg were used; they were distributed in three groups according to a completely randomized design with four replications each. The treatments (T) were: T1, without additive; T2, concentrated plus 1.0 and 0.5 kg of 2% virginiamycin per ton of feed for growing and fattening pigs, respectively; T3, concentrated plus 15 mL of the microbial preparation per kg of body weight (BW) of the animal.The preparation contained 4x106 CFU / ml of lactic acid bacteria and 1.5x105 CFU / mL of yeast. The animals treated with T3 had the highest final weight (98.41 kg, P <0.0001) and the best gain of total weight (69.84 kg; P <0.0001) and daily gain (712.50 g / d, P <0.0001). The most efficient conversion of dry matter (3.04 kykg BW), crude protein (551.63 g/kg BW) and metabolizable energy (41.80 MJ/kg BW) was found in the same group. The incidence of diarrhea was lower in the groups treated with the additives, with no difference between them. It is concluded that the additives improve the productive and sanitary performance of pigs in growth-feed stage, and this effect was greater with the microbial preparation. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-6089 |
| institution | Revista Ciencia y Agricultura |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-60892022-06-16T15:22:18Z Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. Influencia de dos aditivos en la respuesta productiva y sanitaria de cerdos en crecimiento-ceba Flores-Mancheno, Luis Gerardo García-Hernández, Yaneisy Caicedo-Quinche, William Orlando Usca-Méndez, Julio Enrique antibiotic growth promoter growth-feed lactic acid bacteria porcine productivity. antibiótico promotor de crecimiento bacterias lácticas crecimiento-ceba productividad porcina sanidad porcina This work aimed to study the influence of two additives (microbial preparation and antibiotic growth promoter) on the productive and sanitary response of pigs in growth-feed. 120 castrated pigs of 71 days and 28.62 kg were used; they were distributed in three groups according to a completely randomized design with four replications each. The treatments (T) were: T1, without additive; T2, concentrated plus 1.0 and 0.5 kg of 2% virginiamycin per ton of feed for growing and fattening pigs, respectively; T3, concentrated plus 15 mL of the microbial preparation per kg of body weight (BW) of the animal.The preparation contained 4x106 CFU / ml of lactic acid bacteria and 1.5x105 CFU / mL of yeast. The animals treated with T3 had the highest final weight (98.41 kg, P <0.0001) and the best gain of total weight (69.84 kg; P <0.0001) and daily gain (712.50 g / d, P <0.0001). The most efficient conversion of dry matter (3.04 kykg BW), crude protein (551.63 g/kg BW) and metabolizable energy (41.80 MJ/kg BW) was found in the same group. The incidence of diarrhea was lower in the groups treated with the additives, with no difference between them. It is concluded that the additives improve the productive and sanitary performance of pigs in growth-feed stage, and this effect was greater with the microbial preparation. El objetivo del trabajo fue estudiar la respuesta productiva y sanitaria de cerdos en crecimiento-ceba al suministro de los dos aditivos en sus dietas (preparado microbiano y antibiótico promotor del crecimiento). Se utilizaron 120 cerdos castrados de 71 días y 28,62±2,66 kg, distribuidos en tres grupos, según diseño completamente aleatorizado; a cada grupo se le aplicó un tratamiento, con cuatro repeticiones cada uno. Los tratamientos fueron: concentrado sin aditivo (T1); concentrado más 1,0 y 0,5 kg de virginiamicina al 2 % por tonelada de alimento para cerdos en crecimiento y ceba, respectivamente (T2), y concentrado más 15 mL del preparado microbiano por kg de peso vivo (PV) de los animales (T3). El preparado contenía 4x106 UFC/mL de bacterias lácticas y 1,5x105 UFC/mL de levaduras. Los animales tratados con el T3 tuvieron el mayor peso final (98,41 kg, P<0,0001) y la mejor ganancia de peso total (69,84 kg; P<0,0001) y diaria (712,50 g/d, P<0,0001). En el mismo grupo se encontró la conversión más eficiente de materia seca (3,04 kg/kg PV), proteína bruta (551,63 g/kg PV) y energía metabolizable (41,80 MJ/kg PV). La incidencia de diarreas fue menor en los grupos tratados con los aditivos, sin diferencia entre estos. Se concluye que los aditivos mejoran el comportamiento productivo y sanitario de cerdos en crecimiento-ceba, y que este efecto fue mayor con el preparado microbiano. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia 2017-05-07 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion investigation investigación application/pdf https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/6089 10.19053/01228420.v14.n1.2017.6089 Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017); 65-73 Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2017); 65-73 2539-0899 spa https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/6089/5103 Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Ciencia y Agricultura |
| spellingShingle | antibiotic growth promoter growth-feed lactic acid bacteria porcine productivity. antibiótico promotor de crecimiento bacterias lácticas crecimiento-ceba productividad porcina sanidad porcina Flores-Mancheno, Luis Gerardo García-Hernández, Yaneisy Caicedo-Quinche, William Orlando Usca-Méndez, Julio Enrique Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title | Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title_alt | Influencia de dos aditivos en la respuesta productiva y sanitaria de cerdos en crecimiento-ceba |
| title_full | Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title_fullStr | Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title_short | Influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth-fattening pigs. |
| title_sort | influence of two additives on the productive and sanitary response of growth fattening pigs |
| topic | antibiotic growth promoter growth-feed lactic acid bacteria porcine productivity. antibiótico promotor de crecimiento bacterias lácticas crecimiento-ceba productividad porcina sanidad porcina |
| topic_facet | antibiotic growth promoter growth-feed lactic acid bacteria porcine productivity. antibiótico promotor de crecimiento bacterias lácticas crecimiento-ceba productividad porcina sanidad porcina |
| url | https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/6089 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT floresmanchenoluisgerardo influenceoftwoadditivesontheproductiveandsanitaryresponseofgrowthfatteningpigs AT garciahernandezyaneisy influenceoftwoadditivesontheproductiveandsanitaryresponseofgrowthfatteningpigs AT caicedoquinchewilliamorlando influenceoftwoadditivesontheproductiveandsanitaryresponseofgrowthfatteningpigs AT uscamendezjulioenrique influenceoftwoadditivesontheproductiveandsanitaryresponseofgrowthfatteningpigs AT floresmanchenoluisgerardo influenciadedosaditivosenlarespuestaproductivaysanitariadecerdosencrecimientoceba AT garciahernandezyaneisy influenciadedosaditivosenlarespuestaproductivaysanitariadecerdosencrecimientoceba AT caicedoquinchewilliamorlando influenciadedosaditivosenlarespuestaproductivaysanitariadecerdosencrecimientoceba AT uscamendezjulioenrique influenciadedosaditivosenlarespuestaproductivaysanitariadecerdosencrecimientoceba |
