Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization on the production of green-leaf lettuce. The experiment design used randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (6×3), with six doses of fertilizers (1 = 0; 2 = 25; 3 = 50; 4 = 1...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane, Torres, Jose Luiz Rodrigues, Orioli-Junior, Valdeci, Charlo, Hamilton Cesar de Oliveira, Vieira, Dinamar Márcia da Silva
Format:	Online
Language:	eng
Published:	Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC 2019
Subjects:	Lactuca sativa L. Phosphorus Nitrogen Cattle manure Chicken manure Nutrition plant Fósforo Nitrógeno Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de aves Nutrición vegetal
Online Access:	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8521
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

_version_	1801706293785788416
author	Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane Torres, Jose Luiz Rodrigues Orioli-Junior, Valdeci Charlo, Hamilton Cesar de Oliveira Vieira, Dinamar Márcia da Silva
author_facet	Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane Torres, Jose Luiz Rodrigues Orioli-Junior, Valdeci Charlo, Hamilton Cesar de Oliveira Vieira, Dinamar Márcia da Silva
author_sort	Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane
collection	OJS
description	The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization on the production of green-leaf lettuce. The experiment design used randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (6×3), with six doses of fertilizers (1 = 0; 2 = 25; 3 = 50; 4 = 100; 5 = 150, and 6 = 200% of the recommended fertilization for green-leaf lettuce crop) and three sources of fertilizers [cattle manure (CaM) and chicken manure (ChM), decomposed, on a wet basis and applied 100% at planting at the doses: CaM – 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100 Mg ha-1; ChM – 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 Mg ha-1; mineral fertilization (MF) varying the N levels: 0, 37.5, 75, 150, 225, 300 kg ha-1 plus 400 kg ha-1 of P2O5 and 60 kg ha-1 of K2O]. The fertilization with CaM and ChM was more efficient than the MF at increasing the production of green-leaf lettuce, mainly because of  the higher residual effects of P in the Oxisol. The ChM provided a higher soil pH, P and K, while the CaM provided a higher soil Mg, organic carbon and organic matter. The dose with 144% of organic fertilization exclusively on a wet basis corresponding to 72 Mg ha-1 of CaM and 29 Mg ha-1 of ChM resulted in the highest green-leaf lettuce yield.
format	Online
id	oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-8521
institution	Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
language	eng
publishDate	2019
publisher	Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
record_format	ojs
spelling	oai:oai.revistas.uptc.edu.co:article-85212020-08-14T03:56:59Z Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization Análisis de crecimiento de lechuga crespa bajo diferentes fuentes y dosis de fertilización orgánica y mineral Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane Torres, Jose Luiz Rodrigues Orioli-Junior, Valdeci Charlo, Hamilton Cesar de Oliveira Vieira, Dinamar Márcia da Silva Lactuca sativa L. Phosphorus Nitrogen Cattle manure Chicken manure Nutrition plant Lactuca sativa L. Fósforo Nitrógeno Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de aves Nutrición vegetal The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization on the production of green-leaf lettuce. The experiment design used randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (6×3), with six doses of fertilizers (1 = 0; 2 = 25; 3 = 50; 4 = 100; 5 = 150, and 6 = 200% of the recommended fertilization for green-leaf lettuce crop) and three sources of fertilizers [cattle manure (CaM) and chicken manure (ChM), decomposed, on a wet basis and applied 100% at planting at the doses: CaM – 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100 Mg ha-1; ChM – 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 Mg ha-1; mineral fertilization (MF) varying the N levels: 0, 37.5, 75, 150, 225, 300 kg ha-1 plus 400 kg ha-1 of P2O5 and 60 kg ha-1 of K2O]. The fertilization with CaM and ChM was more efficient than the MF at increasing the production of green-leaf lettuce, mainly because of  the higher residual effects of P in the Oxisol. The ChM provided a higher soil pH, P and K, while the CaM provided a higher soil Mg, organic carbon and organic matter. The dose with 144% of organic fertilization exclusively on a wet basis corresponding to 72 Mg ha-1 of CaM and 29 Mg ha-1 of ChM resulted in the highest green-leaf lettuce yield. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia de diferentes fuentes y dosis de fertilización orgánica y mineral en la producción de lechuga crespa. Se utilizó un diseño de bloques completos al azar, en un esquema factorial (6 × 3), donde se evaluaron seis dosis de fertilizante (1 = 0, 2 = 25; 3 = 50; 4 = 100; 5 = 150 y 6 = 200%) de la fertilización recomendada para la lechuga, tres fuentes de abono fertilizante (estiércol bonino (EB) y aves de corral (CP)), descompuesto, aplicado húmedo 100% en la siembra: 1 = EB - 0; 12,5; 25; 50; 75 y 100 Mg ha-1; 2 = CP 0; 5; 10; 20; 30 y 40 Mg ha-1; 3 = Fertilización mineral varió solo las cantidades de N; 3 = 0; 37,5; 75; 150; 225 y 300 kg ha-1, junto a 400 kg ha-1 de P2O5 y 60 kg ha-1 de K2O que se mantuvo en las parcelas con fertilización mineral. La fertilización con EB y CP demostró ser más eficiente que la fertilización mineral en la producción de lechuga crespa, principalmente debido a los mayores efectos residuales del P en el suelo. El estiércol CP proporcionó valores más altos de pH, P y K, mientras que el EB de Mg, materia orgánica y carbono orgánico en el suelo. La dosis del 144% de fertilizantes exclusivamente orgánicos en base húmeda correspondiente a estiércol de 72 Mg ha-1 EB y 29 Mg ha-1 CP, dieron los mejores rendimientos para la lechuga crespa en un Latosol. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de diferentes fontes e doses de adubação orgânica e mineral na produção de alface crespa. O delineamento utilizado foi de blocos casualizados (DBC), em esquema fatorial (6x3), onde foram avaliadas seis doses de fertilizantes: 1 = 0; 2 = 25; 3 = 50; 4 = 100; 5 = 150 = 200 e 6% dá recomendada para a cultura adubação da alface, Fontes fertilizante Três: bovino esterco (EB) e de aves poedeiras (EA), curtumes, in base de Umida, feito de 100% não plantio: 1 = EB - 0; 12,5; 25; 50; 75 e 100 Mg ha -1 ; 2 = EA 0; 5; 10; 20; 30 e 40 Mg ha -1 ; 3 = Adubação mineral variando somente como carga de nitrogênio (N); 3 = 0; 37,5; 75; 150; 225 e 300 kg ha -1 , manter recomendação de 400 kg ha -1de P 2 O 5 e 60 kg ha -1 de K 2 O, pequenas parcelas com adubação mineral. Um com adubação EB e AP Mais eficiente que adubação mineral na Produção de alface encrespados anos, principalmente devido majores Efeitos residuais de fósforo (P) não só mostraram. O esterco AP proporcionou majores valores de pH, fósforo e Potássio I ou EB enquanto que vai de magnésio, matéria orgânica e de carbono não só Orgânico. A 144% de dose das exclusivamente adubações orgânicas in correspondentes Umida base de 72 Mg ha -1 de esterco EB e 29 Mg ha -1 de esterco conferiram AP como majores produtividades de alface crespa num Latossolo. Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC 2019-05-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Text Texto Testo Teste Texto application/pdf https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8521 10.17584/rcch.2019v13i2.8521 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019); 237-247 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2019); 237-247 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 13 No 2 (2019); 237-247 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 13 N. 2 (2019); 237-247 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 13 n. 2 (2019); 237-247 2422-3719 2011-2173 eng https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8521/8713 Brazil; Uberaba Brazil; Uberaba Brazil; Uberaba Brazil; Uberaba Brazil; Uberaba Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
spellingShingle	Lactuca sativa L. Phosphorus Nitrogen Cattle manure Chicken manure Nutrition plant Lactuca sativa L. Fósforo Nitrógeno Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de aves Nutrición vegetal Ribeiro, Rúbia Rejane Torres, Jose Luiz Rodrigues Orioli-Junior, Valdeci Charlo, Hamilton Cesar de Oliveira Vieira, Dinamar Márcia da Silva Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title	Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title_alt	Análisis de crecimiento de lechuga crespa bajo diferentes fuentes y dosis de fertilización orgánica y mineral
title_full	Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title_fullStr	Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title_full_unstemmed	Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title_short	Growth analysis of green-leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
title_sort	growth analysis of green leaf lettuce under different sources and doses of organic and mineral fertilization
topic	Lactuca sativa L. Phosphorus Nitrogen Cattle manure Chicken manure Nutrition plant Lactuca sativa L. Fósforo Nitrógeno Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de aves Nutrición vegetal
topic_facet	Lactuca sativa L. Phosphorus Nitrogen Cattle manure Chicken manure Nutrition plant Lactuca sativa L. Fósforo Nitrógeno Estiércol de ganado Estiércol de aves Nutrición vegetal
url	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/8521
work_keys_str_mv	AT ribeirorubiarejane growthanalysisofgreenleaflettuceunderdifferentsourcesanddosesoforganicandmineralfertilization AT torresjoseluizrodrigues growthanalysisofgreenleaflettuceunderdifferentsourcesanddosesoforganicandmineralfertilization AT oriolijuniorvaldeci growthanalysisofgreenleaflettuceunderdifferentsourcesanddosesoforganicandmineralfertilization AT charlohamiltoncesardeoliveira growthanalysisofgreenleaflettuceunderdifferentsourcesanddosesoforganicandmineralfertilization AT vieiradinamarmarciadasilva growthanalysisofgreenleaflettuceunderdifferentsourcesanddosesoforganicandmineralfertilization AT ribeirorubiarejane analisisdecrecimientodelechugacrespabajodiferentesfuentesydosisdefertilizacionorganicaymineral AT torresjoseluizrodrigues analisisdecrecimientodelechugacrespabajodiferentesfuentesydosisdefertilizacionorganicaymineral AT oriolijuniorvaldeci analisisdecrecimientodelechugacrespabajodiferentesfuentesydosisdefertilizacionorganicaymineral AT charlohamiltoncesardeoliveira analisisdecrecimientodelechugacrespabajodiferentesfuentesydosisdefertilizacionorganicaymineral AT vieiradinamarmarciadasilva analisisdecrecimientodelechugacrespabajodiferentesfuentesydosisdefertilizacionorganicaymineral